21 January 2012

Things we like X, or, suggestions for staying animate

1. Dancing around a burning orange, or, rather, a burning orange candle. I know it is totally possible and not an internet myth because I tried it out (successfully) tonight. Why are pith-wicks so utterly charming?

2. Project Nim, a 2011 documentary directed by James Marsh. Like Man on Wire, Marsh's previous film, this is poignant, and entrancing, and more than a little heartbreaking, but it's also a lovely meditation on what's worth emulating in our closest evolutionary relatives, and what's worth leaving behind.




3. Speaking of animals, they make excellent film collages. I like the bears especially, in this old piece by Joseph Cornell.

4. Gotye's 'State of the Art', a song about a Cotillion electronic home organ gone mad. It's a cautionary tale, I suppose, but I want one for my flat. I give you all full license to dance around the burning orange whilst listening to this very song.



16 January 2012

Things we like IX, or, why I'm willing to stick it out till the apocalypse

1) Edward Gorey’s AMAZING ENVELOPES;

2) The sensation of not having died in a plane crash;

3) When aforementioned yet still relatively obscure Hungarian authors try to suddenly go all hipster on you (“I’m sure I could name ten new rock groups from 2011 that you haven’t even heard of”), and you can retort (at least in your head), “With all due respect, Mr. Krasznahorkai, two erotic gay photographers from Berlin introduced me to Joan as Police Woman in 2007 when we [my friend and I] were circumstantially obligated to share a group train ticket with them,” and not be exaggerating. 

4) Charlie Chaplin AND Buster Keaton IN THE SAME FILM

4) The beautiful things Robert Downey, Jr.’s hair must be doing under that hat:







15 January 2012

Anybody want a peanut? or, Email Exchanges Part I

We both subscribe to, and are sometimes overly obsessive about, a certain tumblr that posts magnificent scientific illustrations. The author, or compiler, or whatever title you'd like to assign to someone who uploads things to the tumblr, periodically answers requests for certain types of material. Usually they are not very funny, but one reading "Do you have an illustration of a peanut by any chance it's for a tattoo" I found inexplicably hilarious. I sent it to Madeleine, and the following exchange ensued.

Madeleine: HAHAHAAA! lauren, will you get a peanut tattoo with me? i realize now that i've subconsciously always wanted one.

Lauren: YES. the question is....where? i say behind the ear. because i've always wanted peanuts behind the ear.

Madeleine: i think the natural correspondance between the shape of ears and the shape of peanuts is a sign from god.

Lauren: if my ears were placed together (without brain!), and made whole again, they would be indistinguishable from a very large peanut.

Madeleine: our brains are, then, by analogy, merely unshelled peanuts! i've long suspected as much.

Lauren: but usually you get two peanuts out of one shell...what does this mean? are we reviving aristotelian visions of love?

Madeleine: but — as no human brain is perfectly symmetrical (oh the price we pay for our fine motor skills and abstract reasoning!), no two peanuts can truly be 'two peas in a pod.' they are attached to each other only tenuously!

All of which, combined with the abnormally large amount of peanut butter consumed today, makes me wonder-- how often do we eat these (however-tenuously-connected) peanut pairs? Are none at all kept together in the production process? Even faced with smooth peanut butter, no paste can asimilate everything perfectly. We shall never really know what it is we spread.

In defense of winter


Every year, back comes Spring, with nasty little birds yapping their fool heads off and the ground all mucked up with plants.  ~ Dorothy Parker

To be fair: I like birds, and I like plants. And, to be fair: it is January, and spring has yet to rear its fool head. But every year I start to get nervous with the first sun rise after the winter solstice, because it means that spring is coming, and spring means summer. 

There is a character in the book I’m reading now (The Melancholy of Resistance by László Krasznahorkai) called Mrs. Eszter. Early in the book, she has an unnerving encounter and afterwards she walks through her village, in the dead of winter, growing stronger and more herself with every step, because she 
genuinely belonged to that class of people who ‘sicken with spring and collapse in summer’, for whom enervating warmth, incapacitating heat and the sun blazing in the sky were a source of terror . . . for it is only winter that can clear their vision, cool their ungovernable passions and reorganize that mass of loose thought dissolved in summer sweats.
YES, I shouted to myself as I read this, FINALLY THERE IS SOMEONE LIKE ME. The next hundred pages or so had me hoping that my resemblance to Mrs. Eszter (a rather sinister character) ended with this predilection for winter, but still — in this respect we are remarkably similar.

Winter, for those of us in the north, is our own little taste of Antarctica: blissful white emptiness. No one is going to harass you with shrieks of “It’s such a beautiful day!” and no one is going to criticize you for feeling quiet and indoorsy. Winter is a relief.

It is also an enhanced awareness of the breath, of the texture of protective things: woolly mammoth sweaters, spiced apple cider, soft voluminous blankets and fires to bake gingerbread. Winter encourages introversion (people, at least the ones around me, are infinitely saner in winter), and with it compassion — ‘the season of giving’ finds its natural home in the snowy months.


Last semester I was translating a small, lovely book all about winter, December by Alexander Kluge and Gerhard Richter. Each day in December gets its own short story, with a few (like the 6th, 10th, and 18th) getting more than one; each story takes place in a different year, though most revolve around WWII or German Unification in 1989. My favorite story is the 30th of December, 1940, in which the son of a rabbi and his friend, who have escaped from Germany to England, sit on the banks of the Cam in the middle of the night, discussing the death of Abel. In the course of this discussion, they introduce the idea of two incompatible wills: the Sommerwille (the will of summer) and the Winterwille (the will of winter). They agree, in a roundabout and Talmudic sort of way, that what it is possible — and perhaps inevitable — to want in summer evaporates in winter, and vice versa. They also agree that evil is nothing but a displaced or “untimely good.”

Their conversation is in many ways a strange tangle, and actually there are large chunks of it that I don’t understand, but I merely want to use this reasoning to defend winter from its gloomy reputation as the dark and deadly season. There is a good in winter, even if it seems a misplaced one (a misplaced turning of the year, or a misplaced celebration of light); more importantly, there is a type of thought — the kind that requires an intact, that is to say unmelted, brain — which is possible only in winter. 

It’s that lack of yapping. That’s what does it for me.